Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 247 Ga. App. 310 - Callaway v. State

247 Ga. App. 310 - Callaway v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
November 2014
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Reaves v. State · Jones v. State · Crawford v. State · 135 Ga. App. 893 - Jones v. State · 161 Ga. App. 132 - Osborn v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[M]ere surplusage will not vitiate an indictment, and need not be established in proof. The material facts which constitute the offense charged must be stated, and they must be proved in evidence. But allegations not essential to such purpose, which might be entirely omitted without affecting the charge and without detriment to the indictment, are considered as mere surplusage, and may be disregarded in evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.