Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 247 IND 263 - Johnson v. State

Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 1969
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State Ex Rel. Casey v. Murray · Barker v. State · Deckard v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is well established that miscalculations and mistakes on the part of the attorney are not sufficient grounds for a belated appeal. Barker v. State, supra; Deckard v. State, supra. Were it otherwise, the time limitation of Rule 2-2 of the Rules of the Supreme Court would be meaningless. Appellant in the present case bases his petition on a mistake and miscalculation by his trial counsel and reliance thereon by his appellate attorney.” Johnson v. State (1966), 247 Ind. 263, 265 , 215 N. E. 2d 38, 39 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.