State v. Schad’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
March 2009
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Palmer v. Brown · State v. Houck · State v. Walker · 44 Cal. App. 2d 417 - People v. Angier · State v. Switzer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The State has the responsibility to appropriately charge the accused with the crime it believes the accused has committed. If the evidence introduced at trial does not support a conviction of the offense charged, the accused cannot be found guilty of some other offense which the State did not see fit to charge. Here, the State did not prove the charges it brought against Houck and, therefore, the convictions of aggravated arson must be reversed.” 240 Kan. at 136 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Dickson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.