Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

247 Kan. 323

In re Jantz

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 24, 1990

Supreme Court of Kansas · decided 1990-10-24

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1992

1 state decisions

Relies on In re Jantz

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1990-10-24

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1WHEREAS this court, in In re Jantz, 243 Kan. 770, 763 P.2d 626 (1988), placed respondent on probation for two years with specific conditions of supervision, and the Honorable Leighton A. Fossey was appointed to supervise the respondent and file an appropriate report with the disciplinary administrator; and

¶2. WHEREAS the disciplinary administrator filed his report with this court on October 15, 1990, which included the report and recommendations of Judge Fossey; and

¶3WHEREAS Judge Fossey and thé disciplinary administrator recommend that the probation of respondent be continued for a period of one year under the same conditions as were previously imposed upon the respondent in order to allow certain financial problems facing respondent to be resolved; therefore,

¶4IT IS ORDERED that the probation, with all conditions granted by this court on October 28, 1988, be continued for an additional one-year period pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 203(a)(5) (1989 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 120), and that all previously imposed conditions of probation remain in full force and effect.

¶5IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Judge Fossey submit to the disciplinary administrator, in October 1991, a report concerning the probation of respondent, and that the disciplinary administrator, upon receipt of such report, submit an appropriate report to the court, at which time the court shall upon notice make such order as justice and equity may require.

¶6IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this order shall be published in the Kansas Reports and that the costs herein be assessed to the respondent.

/247/kan/323 · .json · Public domain