Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 247 Kan. 343 - State v. Beans

State v. Beans’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
December 2022
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently December 2022

8 state decisions

201990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Whiteley v. OKC Corp. · State v. Nixon · State v. MacOmber · State v. Davis · Dewey v. Funk

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In the present case, consent was the sole issue in dispute concerning the rape charge against Beans. Thus, the truthfulness of G.W.’s testimony was an all-important element in the State’s case. Where the State offered testimony by G.W. concerning her prior conviction of prostitution and probation, the trial court erred in refusing to allow rebuttal evidence to show the falsity in her testimony. The credibility of G.W. is die heart of the State’s case.” 247 Kan. at 348 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.