Young v. Hill’s Empirical Analysis
1933
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently November 1961
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kentucky Counties Oil Co. v. Cupler · Indiana Truck Corp. v. Hurry Up Broadway Co. · Hart County Deposit Bank v. Hatfield · Crider v. Providence Coal Mining Company
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Any equipment and property thereon [on the lease] and hereafter to be placed thereon [on the lease], except .drilling machines and machine equipment, and any property which, under the terms of said agreement, it may hereafter acquire an interest in.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Young v. Hill
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.