State v. Callahan’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
November 1975
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Harrell · State v. Smalling · State v. Jemison · State v. Kimberlin · State v. Harrison
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Any person may be compelled to testify in any lawful proceeding against any one who may be charged with having committed the offense of bribery and shall not be permitted to withhold his testimony upon the ground that it may incriminate him or subject him to public infamy; but such testimony shall not afterwards be used against him in any judicial proceedings, except for perjury in giving such testimony.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“that the defendant could not refuse to testify before the Grand Jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.