Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 247 La. 62 - State v. Odom

State v. Odom’s Empirical Analysis

1964

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
May 1983
most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently May 1983 · most notably State v. Isaac (1972), 443 So. 2d 512 - State v. Simmons (1983)

27 state decisions

140196419701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Aldridge v. United States · State v. Hills · State v. Henry · State v. Bueche · State v. Varnado

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “it is not essential for the State to prove the corpus delicti as a condition precedent to the introduction of other evidence to connect the accused with the crime charged, the time and order of receiving testimony being controlled to a large extent by the discretion of the trial judge.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “that the person in the unexplained possession of property recently stolen is the thief.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “and the examination shall be limited to that purpose.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.