Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 247 La. 729 - State v. Oliver

State v. Oliver’s Empirical Analysis

1965

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
2
states following
March 1993
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 38 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently March 1993 · most notably State v. Smith (1971), State v. Wilkerson (1972)

2 federal appellate · 38 state decisions

2601965197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mapp v. Ohio · Aguilar v. Texas · Jones v. United States · Ker v. State of California · Rugendorf v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Counsel was without right to commit a prospective juror in advance as to his evaluation of the credibility of a defense witness. The query had no relevance to the juror's qualification to serve in the trial of the case nor was it calculated to determine whether the juror was biased against appellant."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “right and duty to restrict examination to matters pertaining to qualifications of jurors to serve and whenever examination strays from this purpose or becomes overly lengthy, his action in limiting examination will not be disturbed on appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “positive that they have the heroin with them”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.