Robin Express, Inc. v. Cuccaro’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently December 2021
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Charles Freeland & Sons, Inc. v. Couplin · Gold Dust Corp. v. Zabawa · Lefever v. Lefever
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““If a court or administrative body reopens a case its second decision, be it the same or different from its previous decision, is a new holding; if it refuses to reopen, it decides only not to interfere with its previous decision but stands unimpeached as its original date.” Id. at 264.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““From the various authorities submitted by the employer, it is evident that there is a broad power given the Commission to reopen but the right of appeal from a refusal to reopen is limited to situations involving aggravation,, diminution, or termination of an injury [under Sec. 40 (b)]. This type of situation is not involved in the case at bar [which arises under section 40 (c)].” Id. 247 Md. at 263-64 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““* * * if parties could open decrees and judgments, on appeal, in this indirect way, it would virtually amount to a repeal of the laws limiting the time within which appeals should be taken, and would lead to interminable litigation.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.