Foos v. Steinberg’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently April 2022 · most notably Heron v. Strader (2000), 95 Md. App. 145 - Baker, Watts & Co. v. Miles & Stockbridge (1993)
27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Waldman v. Rohrbaugh · Lichtenberg v. Joyce · Snyder v. Cearfoss · Hutton v. Marx · Stockett v. Sasscer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In reversing the lower court we need go no further than to hold that the appellee’s plea of limitations was not filed within the time contemplated by the Maryland Rules and thus should have been stricken____Rule 342 provides that a plea of limitations must be specially pleaded ... and further provides that the ‘plea of limitations must be filed within the time required by Rule 307 (Time for Defendant’s Initial Pleading).’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““The plea came too late, for pursuant to Rules 342 d 2, 307 a 1 and 309 a the appellee had only fifteen days after January 26, 1965 — the date the court disposed of certain of appellee’s preliminary motions.” id. at 38 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.