Jablinske v. Eckstrom’s Empirical Analysis
1956
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently October 1976
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mattfeld v. Nester · Ranum v. Swenson · Ryan v. Griffin · Olson v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co. · Schleuder v. Soltow
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““* * * It was the duty of the defendants to call the court’s attention to the oversight. A party may not remain silent where there is an unintentional omission in the charge and thereafter assign as error the failure of the court to give the omitted instruction. In view of what transpired, defendants have pre- eluded themselves from asserting such omission as a ground for a new trial.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.