Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 247 N.C. 368 - State v. Moore

State v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis

1957

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
March 1976
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently March 1976

9 state decisions

50195719601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Carson v. Doggett · State v. . Roberts · State v. . Whitener · State v. Cooke · State v. Shackleford

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The language of the Exhibit is susceptible of the inference that it is a certified copy of the record of the North Carolina Department of Motor Vehicles Highway Patrol, signed by a proper official and bearing the seal of the Department, which is ‘admissible in any proceeding in any court in like manner as the original thereof, without further certification.’ “(Nevertheless, note is taken of the figures in the record, for instance figures 1, 2 and 3 each appearing 4 times on the left margin presumably relating to first, second and third revoca tions, and other figures separated by dashes, such as ‘11-10-49’ presumably indicating date of ‘November 10, 1949.’ This practice in judicial records ought not to be followed, and it is not approved. A form sufficiently clear to dispense with necessity of interpretation should be adopted by the Department.)” (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.