247 N.C. App. 232 - State v. Torrence’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
May 2017
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 138 N.C. App. 381 - FormyDuval v. Bunn · 185 N.C. App. 524 - Smith v. Serro · State v. Helms · 194 N.C. App. 490 - Cornett v. Watauga Surgical Group, P.A. · State v. Helms
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]here the [defendant] contends the trial court's decision is based on an incorrect reading and interpretation of the rule governing admissibility of expert testimony, the standard of review on appeal is de novo .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.