247 N.C. App. 342 - State v. Hill’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Washington · State v. Washington · 197 N.C. App. 129 - State v. Gayton-Barbosa · 33 N.C. App. 131 - State v. Vawter · 216 N.C. App. 249 - State v. Collins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This Court repeatedly has held a [d]efendant must preserve the right to appeal a fatal variance.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“give their lay opinions that the person in the surveillance videos was Hill. Specifically, Hill alleges the officers were no better qualified than the jury to identify the suspect in the videos and, therefore, he was prejudiced by the admission of their testimony.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[a]dmissible lay opinion testimony is limited to those opinions or inferences which are (a) rationally based on the perception of the witness and (b) helpful to a clear understanding of his testimony or the determination of a fact in issue.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.