247 N.C. App. 368 - State v. Singletary’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blakely v. Washington · United States v. Salerno · Neder v. United States · Cunningham v. California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he trial court's jury charge was sufficient to address Defendant's concerns, as it left no doubt that it was the jury's duty to determine whether the witness was interested or biased”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Smith“rule of cross-examination, so called because the scope of inquiry is not confined to those matters testified to on direct examination.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[a] witness may be cross-examined on any matter relevant to any issue in the case, including credibility.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.