Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 247 N.C. App. 771 - State v. Crandell

247 N.C. App. 771 - State v. Crandell’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · North Carolina v. Alford · Whren v. United States · United States v. Cortez · Brown v. Texas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo and are subject to full review. Under a de novo review, the court considers the matter anew and freely substitutes its own judgment for that of the lower tribunal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “pattern[ ] of operation of [a] certain kind[ ] of lawbreaker[,]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “walking in opposite direction away from one another in an alley”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.