Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 247 Neb. 660 - Barks v. Cosgriff Co.

Barks v. Cosgriff Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

64
cited by 64 later decisions
2
states following
October 2009
most recently cited

62 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Nichols v. Busse · State v. Carter · Long v. Hacker · Jantzen v. Diller Telephone Co. · Ventura v. State of Nebraska Equal Opportunity Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Failure to make a timely objection waives the right to assert prejudicial error on appeal. ... If, when inadmissible evidence is offered, the party against whom such evidence is offered consents to its introduction, or fails to object or to insist upon ruling on the objection to introduction of such evidence, and otherwise fails to raise the question as to its admissibility, that party is considered to have waived whatever objection he or she may have had thereto, and the evidence is in the record for consideration the same as other evidence.... Since [the defendant] failed to object to [the] testimony regarding the alleged [oral contract], the testimony was properly before the jury for consideration.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.