Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 247 Neb. 785 - State v. Yelli

State v. Yelli’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
3
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably In Re Interest of Amber G. (1996), State v. White (1998)

33 state decisions

220199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Grogan v. Garner · Burks v. United States · Scharffe v. Perkins · Local 408, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. National Labor Relations Board · Marquez v. Texas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Although an issue is actually litigated and determined by a valid and final judgment, and the determination is essential to the judgment, relitigation of the issue in a subsequent action between the parties is not precluded in the following circumstances: “(4) The party against whom preclusion is sought had a significantly heavier burden of persuasion with respect to the issue in the initial action than in the subsequent action; the burden has shifted to his adversary; or the adversary has a significantly heavier burden than he had in the first action[.]””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “would be to hold, in effect, that the losing party in the first action would also have lost had a significantly different burden [been] imposed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.