Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 247 Neb. 817 - State v. Haase

State v. Haase’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
May 2024
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently May 2024

18 state decisions

801995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bullock v. United States · State v. Spotted Elk · State v. Knight · 130 Ill. App. 3d 900 - Shipley v. Stephenson County Electoral Board · Madison County v. Crippen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In connection with the means by which evidence may be taken, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1240 (Reissue 1989), the Legislature has defined an affidavit as a “written declaration under oath, made without notice to the adverse party,” Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1241 (Reissue 1989). For the purposes of more general use, we define an affidavit as a written or printed declaration or statement of facts, made voluntarily, and confirmed by the oath or affirmation of the party making it, taken before a person having authority to administer such oath or affirmation. . . . Obviously, a document subscribed and sworn to before a person not authorized by law to administer oaths is not an affidavit and is void as such. . . . Just as manifestly, the power of a notary to perform notarial functions is limited to the jurisdiction in which the commission issued. . . . Thus, it is clear that the original document filed as a poverty affidavit in this case was no such thing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.