Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 247 Or. 301 - State v. Turner

State v. Turner’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
9
states following
September 2009
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2009 · most notably North Carolina v. Pearce (1969), State v. Fitzpatrick (1980)

5 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

10019671970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"After an appeal or post-conviction proceeding has resulted in the ordering of a retrial for errors other than an erroneous sentence * * * and the defendant has again been convicted, no harsher sentence can be given than that initially imposed. If the initial sentence was incarceration, the defendant subsequently cannot be sentenced to any longer term than the time still to be served upon his initial sentence."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"[W]hen the state grants a criminal appeal as a matter of right to one convicted of a crime, as it has, our procedural policy should be not to limit that right by requiring the defendant to risk a more severe sentence in order to exercise that right of appeal. ORS 138.020." [7]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[I]t seems quite obvious that the possibility of a more severe sentence in the event of a successful appeal or post-conviction proceeding and a subsequent new trial and conviction would `chill' a defendant's desire to correct an erroneously conducted initial trial.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.