247 Or. App. 199 - State v. Trivitt’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We review the denial of a motion for judgment of acquittal to determine whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the state, a rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the offense proved beyond a reasonable doubt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“defendant's conduct constituted an attempt to interfere with *** [the petitioner] through a third party, ORS 107.718(1)(e), and thus constituted a violation of the FAPA order.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“'interfering' within the context of the statute simply could not encompass [the] defendant's conduct, which did not constitute more than offensive behavior.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.