Solley v. Weaver’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 1990
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hewitt v. Reserve Life Insurance · Fruehauf Trailer Co. v. McElmurray · Elkins v. South Carolina & Georgia R. R. · Weatherly v. Covington · Marshall v. Creel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“■ “We have held in many cases that every ground of appeal ought to be so distinctly stated that the Court may at once see the point which it is called upon to decide without having to ‘grope in the dark’ to ascertain the precise point at issue. The object of an exception is to present some distinct principle or question of law which the appellant claims to have been violated by the Court in the trial of the case from which 'the appeal is taken, and to present it in such form that it may be properly reviewed. Hewitt v. Reserve Life Ins. Co., 235 S. C. 201, 110 S. E. (2d) 852 ; Fruehauf Trailer Co. v. McElmurray, 236 S. C. 141, 113 S. E. (2d) 756 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“; “Each exception must contain a concise statement of one proposition of law or fact which this. Court is. asked to review,/and the same • assignment of error should not be repeated. Each exception must contain within itself a complete assignment of error, * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.