Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 247 S.C. 347 - Jeffords v. Berry

Jeffords v. Berry’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
March 2000
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 2000

2 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

4019661970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gardner v. Kirven · McGhee v. Wells · Farmers Bank v. Bradham · McInnis v. McRae · McPherson v. McPherson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Our courts, in interpreting this statute, have held that conveyances shall be set aside under two conditions: First, where the transfer is made by the grantor with the actual intent of defrauding his creditors where that intent is imputable to the grantee, even though there is a valuable consideration; and, second, where a transfer is made without actual intent to defraud the grantor's creditors, but without consideration. Farmers' Bank v. Bradham , 129 S.C. 270, 123 S.E. 835 ; McInnis v. McRae , 134 S.C. 162 , 132 S.E. 473 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “for any intent or purpose to delay, hinder, or defraud creditors and others of their just and lawful actions, suits, debts, * * * shall be deemed and taken * * * to be clearly and utterly void, frustrate, and of no effect.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.