Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 247 So. 2d 821 - Belk v. Bean

247 So. 2d 821 - Belk v. Bean’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
April 2016
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently April 2016

1 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

2019711980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hart v. Backstrom · Beard v. Stanley · State ex rel. Booze v. Cresswell · Pigford v. State Ex Rel. Broach · Board of Education of Forrest County v. Sigler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * Where statutes refer specifically to another statute, it specifically embodies the statute referred to into the adopting statute. The effect of the adopting of an earlier statute is to incorporate the entire section of the earlier statute, the same as if reeopied in the later statute. 50 Am. Jur. Statutes section 38, page 58 (1944). In the instant case the amendment of Chapter 20, section 4, Laws, 1953, by Chapter 300, Laws, 1960, did not amend Chapter 25, section 4, Laws of 1953 because Chapter 25 had adopted the method originally set forth in Chapter 20, section 4, Laws, 1953, and this was not amended; therefore, the Board of Education of Lee County retained the discretion to approve or disapprove the nomination of a superintendent of the Nettleton Line Consolidated School.” 3”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.