247 SO3D 85 - Durant v. State

       Third District Court of Appeal
                               State of Florida

                           Opinion filed May 16, 2018.
         Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

                               ________________

                               No. 3D17-2388
                        Lower Tribunal No. 12-14823B
                            ________________


                              Brandon Durant,
                                    Appellant,

                                        vs.

                            The State of Florida,
                                    Appellee.



      An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the
Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jose L. Fernandez, Judge.

      Brandon Durant, in proper person.

     Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and David Llanes, Assistant Attorney
General, for appellee.


Before SALTER, EMAS and FERNANDEZ, JJ.

      PER CURIAM.
      Brandon Durant, the defendant, appeals the trial court’s denial of his

3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence. Durant was charged with eleven counts

of attempted first degree murder with a deadly weapon, after shooting into a home

occupied by eleven people. He was charged under the section 775.087, Florida

Statutes (2014) (“10/20/Life Statute”); each count of the information alleged that

he possessed and discharged a firearm. The jury returned a guilty verdict on all

eleven counts. However, the jury found that Durant only possessed a firearm and

did not discharge a firearm. The trial court sentenced Durant to life in prison on

each of the eleven counts and imposed eleven mandatory minimum consecutive

ten-year sentences under the 10/20/Life statute. Durant alleged in his 3.800 motion

that his eleven mandatory minimum ten-year sentences are illegal because they

were imposed consecutively instead of concurrently.

      The Florida Supreme Court has clearly delineated that “consecutive

sentencing of mandatory minimum imprisonment terms for multiple firearm

offenses is impermissible if the offenses arose from the same criminal episode and

a firearm was merely possessed but not discharged.” Williams v. State,

186 So. 3d 989, 993

 (Fla. 2016); see also Walton v. State,

208 So. 3d 60, 64

 (Fla. 2016).

Accordingly, we find that the trial court erred when it consecutively sentenced

Durant to eleven mandatory minimum ten-year sentences. We thus reverse and

remand for correction of the sentence in accordance with the Florida Supreme



                                        2
Court precedent set forth in Williams,

186 So. 3d at 993

, and Walton,

208 So. 3d at 64

.   The defendant need not be present when the trial court enters its order

correcting the sentence.

      Reversed and remanded with instructions.




                                        3