Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 247 SW2D 686 - Lehr v. Moll

Lehr v. Moll’s Empirical Analysis

1952

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
March 1983
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently March 1983

2 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

801952196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Judd v. Walker · Rice v. Waddill · State Ex Rel. Williams v. Buzard · Ess v. Griffith · Coleman v. Hagey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a resulting trust must arise, if at all, at the instant the deed is taken. Unless the transaction is such that the moment the title passes the trust results from the transaction itself, then no trust results. It cannot be created by subsequent occurrences.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.