Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 248 A2D 764 - McAvoy v. Rush

McAvoy v. Rush’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
3
states following
August 1983
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently August 1983

6 state decisions

40196919701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sowles v. Beaumier

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “52(a) Effect. “In all actions tried upon the facts the court shall, upon request of a party made as a motion within 5 days after notice of the decision, or may upon its own motion, find the facts specially and state separately its conclusions of law thereon and direct the entry of the appropriate judgment. Requests for findings are not necessary for purposes of review. Findings of fact shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous, and due regard shall be given to .the opportunity of the court to judge the credibility of the witnesses.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.