Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 248 Ala. 53 - Walker County v. White

Walker County v. White’s Empirical Analysis

1946

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
December 2016
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently December 2016

22 state decisions

10019461950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Montgomery v. Sparks · Patterson v. Jefferson County · Huddleston v. Fuller · Bradford v. State · State v. Board of School Commissioners

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"intended to confer authority on the governor and on the attorney general to cause actions to be instituted in the name of the state or county as the case might be, to recover funds illegally withdrawn, so that such suits might not be prevented or handicapped by local influence or embarrassment. In other words, the foregoing statutes provide a plan for central law enforcement, removed as much as possible from local feeling and interference."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the mere fact that the suit is brought by the state for the benefit of Walker County, will not preclude Walker County in its own right from also being made a party.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the state could not sue to recover funds of the county illegally disbursed, because there was no statute corresponding with”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.