Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 248 Ala. 548 - Cobb v. State

Cobb v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1947

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
November 1980
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently November 1980

10 state decisions

4019471950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pilley v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““As observed in Pilley v. State, 247 Ala. 523 , 25 So.2d 57 , our more recent decisions disapprove an argument of the character above outlined. But the opinion in the Pilley case also suffices to show that any evil effects, if any, in the instant case, were eradicated by the withdrawal of the remark and the instruction of the court to the jury as above outlined.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.