Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 248 F.1d 414 - Humphreys v. Walsh

Humphreys v. Walsh’s Empirical Analysis

248 F. 414 · 1918

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
March 1933
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Galliher v. Cadwell · Plumley v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts · Kirby v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railroad · Patterson v. Hewitt · Alsop v. Riker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In legal significance, ‘laches’ is not mere lapse of time, whether greater or less than the precise time of a statute of limitations; it is delay for such time as makes the doing of equity either impossible or doubtful, as involves the inequity of permitting a claim to be asserted after the death of parties, change of title, or Intervention of the rights of others, where, in consequence, evidence has been lost or become obscured, the discovery of the truth is made diiiieult, and the party attacked is placed in a position of evident disadvantage.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.