Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 248 F.1d 897 - Edmonds v. Stern

Edmonds v. Stern’s Empirical Analysis

248 F. 897 · 1918

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
April 1990
most recently cited

6 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 1990

6 federal appellate ·

30191819201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on West Pub. Co. v. Edward Thompson Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The two things [the song and the orchestral score] were legally separate, and independent of each other; it makes no difference that such separate and independent existence might to a certain extent have grown out of plaintiff’s consent to the incorporation of his melody in the orchestration. When that consent was given, a right of property sprang into existence, not at all affected by the conveyance of any other right. 9”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.