Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 248 F.2d 458 - Hare v. Hurwitz

Hare v. Hurwitz’s Empirical Analysis

248 F.2d 458 · 1957

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
April 1999
most recently cited

12 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently April 1999

12 federal appellate ·

6019571960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Germaine · Steele v. United States No. 2 · Burnap v. United States · United States ex rel. Chapman v. Federal Power Commission · United States v. Mouat

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In cases where the United States or an officer or agency thereof is a party, allowance of sixty days to the government, its officers and agents is well justified. For example, in a tax case the Bureau of Internal Revenue must first consider and decide whether it thinks an appeal should be taken. This recommendation goes to the Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Tax Division in the Department of Justice, who must examine the case and make a recommendation. The file then goes to the Solicitor General, who must take the time to go through the papers and reach a conclusion. If these departments are rushed, the result will be that an appeal is taken merely to preserve the right, or without adequate consideration, and once taken it is likely to go forward, as it is easier to refrain from an appeal than to dismiss it. Since it would be unjust to allow the United States, its officers or agencies extra time and yet deny it to the other parties in the case, the rule gives all parties in the ease 60 days.” 28 U.S.C.A. Rule 73(a) P. 434.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[B]ut if the United States or an officer or agency thereof is a party, the notice of appeal may be filed by any party within 60 days after such entry.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.