Miller v. Boles’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently July 1995
6 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Gideon v. Wainwright · Mapp v. Ohio · Townsend v. Sain · Escobedo v. Illinois
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“habeas applicant did not receive a full and fair evidentiary hearing in a state court, either at the time of the trial or in a collateral proceeding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sheftic v. Boles“[a]s a practical matter the circuit court is the forum to petition in order to get a full State court evidentiary hearing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sheftic v. Boles“does not appear to have the facilities to hold evidentiary hearings on original writs addressed to it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sheftic v. Boles
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.