Ranchers Exploration and Development Co. v. Anaconda Co.’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 2007
4 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 30 U.S.C. § 22 · 30 U.S.C. § 23 · 30 U.S.C. § 28 · 30 U.S.C. § 30
Relies on Belk v. Meagher · Cole v. Ralph · Chrisman v. Miller · Erhardt Boaro · Union Oil Co of California v. Smith
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.