Muir v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 2014
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Lattarulo v. State · Foskey v. Foskey · 238 Ga. App. 757 - Shaw v. State · 161 Ga. App. 129 - Beaman v. State · 227 Ga. App. 666 - Gaston v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“I charge you, ladies and gentleman, that a chemical analysis of a person’s blood, urine, breath or other bodily substance shall be considered valid if their analysis was performed according to the methods approved by the Division of Forensic Sciences of the Georgia Bureau of Investigation, and by individuals possessing a valid permit issued by the Division of Forensic Sciences for this purpose. And if the arresting officer at the time of the arrest advised the person arrested of her right to an additional chemical test or tests of her blood, urine, breath, or other bodily substance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bailey v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.