248 Ga. App. 551 - Swanson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
May 2018
most recently cited
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Arizona v. Youngblood · Travaglia v. Pennsylvania · Willis v. Zant · Anderson v. State · Perano v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When we review a trial court’s decision on a motion to suppress, the evidence is construed most favorably to uphold the findings and judgment of the trial court; the trial court’s findings on disputed facts and credibility are adopted unless they are clearly erroneous and will not be disturbed if there is any evidence to support them.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“there [was] no evidence that the master DVD was destroyed out of an interested or sinister motive or through a conscious doing of wrong”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ceballos v. State“no evidence to show 'bad faith' on the part of law enforcement which resulted in the destruction of [the defendant's] blood sample”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ceballos v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.