248 Ga. App. 657 - Daker v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
July 2019
most recently cited
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Blockburger v. United States · United States v. Dixon · 52 Cal. App. 4th 568 - People v. Kelley · 212 Mich. App. 298 - People v. White · 145 Ga. App. 60 - Ramsey v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If we were to accept Daker’s argument, then it would be impossible for the State to prosecute repeat offenders of the stalking statute as, having once used the evidence to demonstrate a course of conduct, the State would be forever barred from using that evidence again in establishing a subsequent stalking violation. As stalking is, by its very nature, a cumulative crime, Daker’s interpretation of double jeopardy would eviscerate the purpose of the stalking statute, leaving would-be stalkers free to begin stalking their victim with a clean slate following a stalking conviction. We cannot believe the legislature intended such result.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.