Binder v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently November 1992
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Baker v. State · Wedmore v. State · Chesterfield v. State · Burton v. State · Tyrrel v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““. . . [I] n examining the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain a criminal conviction, the Supreme Court has the duty, as a matter of law, to decide whether the evidence is sufficient to cause reasonable men to believe that the defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. In resolving this question the reviewing court can pass on the credibility of the testimony to the extent of determining whether it meets this test. Riggs v. State (1958), 287 Ind. 629 , 632, 147 N. E. 2d 579 ; Johnson v. State (1957), 236 Ind. 509, 515 , 141 N. E. 2d 444 ; Thompson v. State (1939), 215 Ind. 129, 137 , 19 N. E. 2d 165 ; Eberling v. State (1894), 136 Ind. 117, 121 , 35 N. E. 1023 ; Baker v. State (1956), 236 Ind. 55 , 138 N. E. 2d. 641.” 248 Ind. at 45 , 221 N. E. 2d at 894-895 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bryant v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.