Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 248 Ind. 81 - MacOn v. State

MacOn v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 1972
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United Gas Improvement Co. v. Continental Oil Co. · Murray v. United States · Fields v. City of Fairfield · State Ex Rel. MacOn v. Orange Circuit Court · State Ex Rel. MacOn v. Orange Circuit Court

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Even though no showing is made in the case of any merit, and even though the Public Defender has found no merit exists, and even though we thus far have been shown that no merit exists, and even though the petitioner or his trial counsel herein have not pointed out any specific meritorious error for consideration here, we have, nevertheless, directed the trial court to appoint counsel, at taxpayers' expense, to prepare an application for a belated motion for a new trial, if such counsel can find any ground for filing such an application in good faith.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The present petition before us sets forth no specific grounds or alleged errors which would support the petition for a writ of certiorari to review the overruling of his belated motion for a new trial. As we have previously stated, it is the duty of counsel to keep trial notes and from such notes to prepare the proper motion for a new trial or petition for a writ of certiorari within the time prescribed. We are asking no greater duty on the part of counsel, nor more speed than is required in Federal court cases”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The appellant had counsel in the trial court. If such counsel found that there is meritorious grounds for a new trial, we have the right to assume that under his duties as such counsel, he would have filed such a motion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.