Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 248 Kan. 65 - State v. Walbridge

State v. Walbridge’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
December 2015
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently December 2015

24 state decisions

160199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Roberts v. United States · Chambers v. United States · State v. Adee · Szoboszlay v. Glessner · People v. Ledford

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[wjhenever any person has been found guilty of a crime, the court may adjudge any of die following: ... (3) release the defendant on probation if the current crime of conviction and criminal history fall within a presumptive nonprison category or through a departure for substantial and compelling reasons subject to such conditions as die court may deem appropriate. In felony cases, except for violations of K.S.A. 8-1567 and amendments thereto, the court may include confinement in a county jail not to exceed 60 days, which need not be served consecutively, as a condition of an original probation sentence and up to 60 days in a county jail upon each revocation of the probation sentence, or community corrections placement.” L. 2000, ch. 182, § 3.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““We have consistently recognized that probation is a privilege granted by the sentencing court and that the court has broad power and authority in imposing conditions of probation so long as such conditions do not violate ■ statutory law'or constitute an , abuse of discretion by the court.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““The court may impose any conditions of probation, suspension of sentence or assignment to a community correctional services program that the court deems proper, including but not limited to requiring that the defendant: (8) support the defendant’s dependents.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.