Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 248 La. 934 - Hayes v. Muller

Hayes v. Muller’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently May 2018 · most notably Foster v. Breaux (1972), 271 So. 2d 579 - Johnson v. Schneider (1972)

33 state decisions

120196619701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Reeves v. Globe Indemnity Co. of New York · Hayes v. Muller · Hope v. Madison · Quarles v. Lewis · Douglas v. Haro

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"It is seen that the foregoing article is merely declaratory of the appropriate action to be taken by the district court in disposing of cases on peremptory exceptions. In cases where the peremptory exception is sustained by reason of insufficiency of allegations, the judge should permit an amendment to the petition whenever possible. Conversely, if the objection to the petition . . . cannot be removed, the judge is obliged. . . to dismiss the action."”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A judgment of dismissal with prejudice shall have the effect of a final judgment of absolute dismissal after trial”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““However, although the judgment of dismissal is res judicata of the cause of action therein alleged on a verbal contract, it is not res judicata of plaintiffs’ present demand for recovery against Muller on a quantum meruit basis as this claim is clearly independent of the cause previously asserted in this suit and has never been adjudicated. ( 248 La. 934 , 183 So.2d 310, 312 ).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.