James v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1964
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 1986
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on National Labor Relations Board v. F. W. Woolworth Co. · Shedd v. State · Harper v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““One may be guilty of larceny without being present at the time and place of the theft, if he in some guilty way participates in it, as where it appears that accused actually advised and procured commission of the crime, encouraged, aided and abetted its commission, and helped to plan the theft with the understanding that he would receive some of the benefits from it. 52 C.J.S. Larceny §§ 57, 154; 14 Am.Jur., Criminal Law, §§ 95-101; Shedd v. State, 228 Miss. 381 , 87 So.2d 898 (1956), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 944 , 77 S.Ct. 262 , 1 L.Ed.2d 237 .” ( 248 Miss. at 780 , 160 So.2d at 696 )”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.