Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 248 N.C. 334 - State v. Perry

State v. Perry’s Empirical Analysis

1958

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
July 1987
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 1987 · most notably State v. Tolley (1976), State v. Spencer (1970)

1 federal appellate · 34 state decisions

1701958196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · Betts v. Brady · Strauder v. West Virginia · Hernandez v. Texas · Norris v. State of Alabama

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Whether a defendant has been given by the court a reasonable time and opportunity to investigate and produce evidence, if he -can, of racial discrimination in the drawing and selection of a grand jury panel must be determined from the facts in each particular case. After a careful examination of all the facts in the instant case, it is our opinion that the trial court denied the defendant a reasonable opportunity and time to investigate and produce evidence, if such exists, in respect to the allegations of racial discrimination as to the grand jury set forth in the motion to quash and in the supporting affidavit of Samuel S. Mitchell. Whether the defendant can establish the alleged racial discrimination or not, due process of law demands that he have his day in court on this matter, and such day he does not have, unless he has a reasonable opportunity and time to- investigate and produce his evidence, if he has any.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.