Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 248 N.C. App. 388 - State v. Barnes

248 N.C. App. 388 - State v. Barnes’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · California v. Beheler · Minnesota v. Murphy · State v. Buchanan · State v. Garcia

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Based on the totality of the circumstances, including the fact that Defendant was on probation during the search of Mr. Lewis' residence, we conclude that Defendant was not subjected to a formal arrest or a restraint on his freedom of movement of the degree associated with formal arrest [even though handcuffed during search of the residence]. Therefore, we agree with the trial court that Defendant was not 'in custody' for purposes of Miranda .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Determining whether an individual's freedom of movement was curtailed, however, is simply the first step in the analysis, not the last. Not all restraints on freedom of movement amount to custody for purposes of Miranda .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.