248 N.C. App. 815 - State v. Young’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Lawrence · State v. Fritsch · State v. Lee · 69 N.C. App. 38 - State v. Rozier · State v. Murray
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]lthough the evidence is circumstantial, it does support the inference that defendant and [his accomplices] agreed to take [the first victim's] car and to go on to commit other unlawful acts, with defendant wielding the shotgun and another person driving the car.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Massey · State v. Stroud“[t]aken together, this evidence is sufficient to show that defendant knew in advance that a robbery was going to occur, that he participated with at least one other individual, namely the person driving the car, in the robbery with each having preassigned roles and that defendant and at least one other individual conspired to commit the robbery.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Massey
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.