248 N.Y. 560
Decided May 11, 1928
New York Court of Appeals · decided 1928-05-11
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1928-05-11
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently February 1969
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 Order of Appellate Division and that of Special Term reversed and defendant’s motion for judgment granted, with costs in all courts. Question certified answered in *561 the negative. Held, that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action in that it fails to state any facts from which an inference of negligence is possible.
¶2 Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Andrew's, Lehman, Kellogg and O’Brien, JJ.