Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 248 ORAPP 130 - State v. Rubio

State v. Rubio’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Because the only error was the inclusion of terms in the judgments that the trial court had no authority to impose, the appropriate remedy is to remand with instructions to delete the erroneous terms from the judgments.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “there do not remain options that the trial court permissibly could adopt on resentencing, * * * that relate to this error”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.