Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 248 So. 2d 355 - Ebert v. Macaluso

248 So. 2d 355 - Ebert v. Macaluso’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
September 1975
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Gaspard v. LeMaire · Lomenick v. Schoeffler · Talbert v. South Carolina Insurance · McKenzie v. State · Reynolds v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * While the Court of Appeal is duty bound to consider both law and fact, it should accord such weight to factual findings of the lower court as they deserve and thus, avoid retrying cases from the record, particularly if the outcome was influenced by the credibility of witnesses appearing before the trial judge who has the duty to evaluate their testimony. * * * ””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.