Hamburg v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1971
Citation profile
49 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently August 2008 · most notably Conner v. State (1994), 860 So. 2d 704 - Howell v. State (2003)
49 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jones v. United States · Chambers v. Maroney · Boyd v. United States · Cotton v. United States · Fuqua v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“one who is the owner in possession of the premises ... is presumed to be in constructive possession of the articles found in or on the property possessed.”
14 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Jones v. State · Buggs v. State“The officer was told that the suspect had attempted to make a sale of LSD. An attempt to commit a felony is also a felony, (cite omitted). The officers saw an automobile “without a tag” meeting the description given by the informer on the police radio. We are of the opinion that the information given to the arresting officer was sufficient probable cause on which to make an arrest. The bulletin on the police radio was sufficient information to indicate probable cause for an arrest. Fuqua v. State, 246 Miss. 191 , 145 So.2d 152 (1962); Shay v. State, 229 Miss. 186 , 90 So.2d 209 (1956); Parks v. State, 180 Miss. 768 , 178 So. 473 (1938).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Curry v. State“It is apparent from the amendment to the code section that the legislature did not intend to prevent the knowledge of the juvenile's delinquency from being given to the proper state officials, particularly where such information could not be used against the juvenile delinquent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.